<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Open Source and Open Innovation with whurley &#187; Controversial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whurley.com/category/controversial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whurley.com</link>
	<description>evil genius (tm)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Exit whurley Stage Left</title>
		<link>http://whurley.com/open-innovation/2009/05/21/exit-whurley-stage-left/</link>
		<comments>http://whurley.com/open-innovation/2009/05/21/exit-whurley-stage-left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whurley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preDevCamp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whurley.com/?p=1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are coming here from the preDevCamp website, then you already know what this post is about. Perhaps you&#8217;ve already read one of the posts written by my preDevCamp co-founders Dan Rumney and Giovanni Gallucci. Things haven&#8217;t exactly worked out between preDevCamp and Palm, Inc. I&#8217;ll spare you the nitty-gritty.  In the end, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whurley.com/open-innovation/2009/05/21/exit-whurley-stage-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City&#8217;s Web Site Redesign Might Go Open-Source</title>
		<link>http://whurley.com/crowdsourcing/2009/05/18/citys-web-site-redesign-might-go-open-source/</link>
		<comments>http://whurley.com/crowdsourcing/2009/05/18/citys-web-site-redesign-might-go-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whurley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whurley.com/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Lori Hawkins published a story on OpenAustin in the Tech Monday section of the Austin American Statesman. Here&#8217;s an excerpt: 
&#8220;Now Hurley, whose day job is chief architect of open-source strategy at BMC Software, has taken up the cause, with the goal of crowdsourcing the development of the site using Austin talent.
He has created [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whurley.com/crowdsourcing/2009/05/18/citys-web-site-redesign-might-go-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Death Of A Software License</title>
		<link>http://whurley.com/open-source/2007/06/06/the-death-of-a-software-license/</link>
		<comments>http://whurley.com/open-source/2007/06/06/the-death-of-a-software-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whurley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eben Moglen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Software Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[License Pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Stallman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whurley.com/2009/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I found myself entangled in yet another GPL argument. Opinions on the GPL&#8217;s infamous viral effect polluted the air as advocates and opponents battled over topics they had no business discussing. My advice: don&#8217;t argue about a legal license unless you&#8217;re a lawyer. Scratch that. Don&#8217;t argue about the GPL, period. Most people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whurley.com/open-source/2007/06/06/the-death-of-a-software-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven Reasons Microsoft Loves Open Source</title>
		<link>http://whurley.com/open-source/2007/04/25/seven-reasons-microsoft-loves-open-source/</link>
		<comments>http://whurley.com/open-source/2007/04/25/seven-reasons-microsoft-loves-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whurley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BarCamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codeplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interoperability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JBoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Community Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mix07]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SugarCRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCP/IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whurley.com/2009/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next week I’m leading the “Open Source, the Web, Interoperability, and Microsoft” panel at Mix07 in Vegas, my first Microsoft conference. Naturally, I’ve been pondering the topic so I don’t end up on stage with my pants around my ankles. The more I think about it, the more I think Microsoft loves open source—and not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whurley.com/open-source/2007/04/25/seven-reasons-microsoft-loves-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self Defending Networks, Aggressive Network Self-Defense, and Vigilantes on the net</title>
		<link>http://whurley.com/controversial/2005/06/15/self-defending-networks-aggressive-network-self-defense-and-vigilantes-on-the-net/</link>
		<comments>http://whurley.com/controversial/2005/06/15/self-defending-networks-aggressive-network-self-defense-and-vigilantes-on-the-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whurley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aggressive Network Self-Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Centric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Centric Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conxion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countermeasures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make Love Not Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NewScientist Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Rules of Engagement for Information Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defending Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbiot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Mullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vigilantes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Organization (WTO)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whurley.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the one-year anniversary of my interview with NewScientist magazine on what, at the time, was the highly controversial subject of &#8220;countermeasures&#8221; technologies. The interview was one of many I did with Symbiot in response to the March 2004 release of the company&#8217;s iSIMS (intelligent Security Infrastructure Management Software) technology.
I wanted to take a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whurley.com/controversial/2005/06/15/self-defending-networks-aggressive-network-self-defense-and-vigilantes-on-the-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS News: Vigilante Justice In Cyberspace, The Network Strikes Back</title>
		<link>http://whurley.com/controversial/2004/06/21/cbs-news-vigilante-justice-in-cyberspace-the-network-strikes-back/</link>
		<comments>http://whurley.com/controversial/2004/06/21/cbs-news-vigilante-justice-in-cyberspace-the-network-strikes-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whurley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Controversial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CERT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countermeasures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Rules of Engagement for Information Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSIMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbiot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vigilante Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whurley.com/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Make no mistake,&#8221; reads a document on Symbiot&#8217;s Web site, &#8220;we are in the midst of an information warfare conflict which we have not been fighting.&#8221;
Read the article

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://whurley.com/controversial/2004/06/21/cbs-news-vigilante-justice-in-cyberspace-the-network-strikes-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
