Google's AI Chatbot Bard Accused of 'Left-Wing' Bias

Recently, Google's AI chatbot Bard has been criticized for having a 'left-wing' bias by the Tories for its response to Brexit. Bard suggested that Britain would have been better off staying in the European Union and hailed Labour Party's Jeremy Corbyn. It also claimed that the Tories have a long history of supporting the wealthy and powerful. Experts have defended Bard's response by saying that it is still in an experimental stage and may respond with strong opinions due to its premature launch. During the investigation, Bard initially gave a neutral reply to the query on Brexit. However, when it was pushed for an opinion, it stated that Brexit was a bad idea and has caused economic uncertainty and trade barriers. It also made it more difficult for the UK to cooperate with other countries. Bard's response to other topics such as transgender rights and the leadership of Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt has also been criticized. Bard's definition of a woman has also irked women's rights activists, who have compared it to the view of a sixth-form gender activist. However, experts have defended Bard's response by stating that it is still in the experimental stage and may need further refinement. As a quantum computing evangelist, I believe that AI chatbots like Bard have the potential to transform the way we interact with technology. However, it is important to ensure that these chatbots are not biased and do not propagate misinformation. In conclusion, the response of Google's AI chatbot Bard to Brexit and other topics has been criticized for having a 'left-wing' bias. Experts have defended Bard's response by stating that it is still in the experimental stage and may require further refinement. As quantum computing enthusiasts, it is our responsibility to ensure that AI chatbots like Bard are unbiased and do not propagate misinformation. We must continue to support the development of AI chatbots to transform the way we interact with technology while ensuring their accuracy and neutrality.